27.08.2007, 10:43
Softwareentwicklung ist nun mal keine klassische Ingenieursdisziplin wo sich alles berechnen lässt.
Und bei Software gibt es keine "Vorwarnungen" bevor sie versagt...
Es bleibt ja Menschenarbeit, und die machen nun mal leider Fehler ^_^
VDB
The book "Code Complete" by Steve McConnell has a brief section about error
expectations. He basically says that the range of possibilities can be as
follows:
(a) Industry Average: "about 15 - 50 errors per 1000 lines of delivered
code." He further says this is usually representative of code that has some
level of structured programming behind it, but probably includes a mix of
coding techniques.
(b) Microsoft Applications: "about 10 - 20 defects per 1000 lines of code
during in-house testing, and 0.5 defect per KLOC (KLOC IS CALLED AS 1000 lines of code) in released
product (Moore 1992)." He attributes this to a combination of code-reading
techniques and independent testing (discussed further in another chapter of
his book).
Und bei Software gibt es keine "Vorwarnungen" bevor sie versagt...
Es bleibt ja Menschenarbeit, und die machen nun mal leider Fehler ^_^
VDB
The book "Code Complete" by Steve McConnell has a brief section about error
expectations. He basically says that the range of possibilities can be as
follows:
(a) Industry Average: "about 15 - 50 errors per 1000 lines of delivered
code." He further says this is usually representative of code that has some
level of structured programming behind it, but probably includes a mix of
coding techniques.
(b) Microsoft Applications: "about 10 - 20 defects per 1000 lines of code
during in-house testing, and 0.5 defect per KLOC (KLOC IS CALLED AS 1000 lines of code) in released
product (Moore 1992)." He attributes this to a combination of code-reading
techniques and independent testing (discussed further in another chapter of
his book).
